RLUSD’s Japan Launch Is Only Part of the Story
What USDC, RLUSD, and JPYSC reveal about Japan’s emerging stablecoin access model, legal routes, platform functions, and the difference between availability and unrestricted circulation.
Independent evidence registry · reviewed through
Stable or Gone connects current lifecycle state to issuers, operators, material events, reserve and redemption structures, evidence sources, and the questions that remain unresolved.
Search canonical records
Start with a question
Search and filter lifecycle, issuance, reference target, backing, and evidence state.
→Bounded comparisonCompare recordsCompare historical registry fields while keeping unknown and not-recorded values explicit.
→189 eventsFollow changesRead canonical subject changes separately from registry publication history.
→107 organizationsExplore organizationsSee issuers, operators, governance bodies, and their recorded relationships.
→Scoped recordsAccess and regulationReview jurisdiction and platform-function context without flattening access into a universal label.
→Reviewed explanationsRead the methodologyUse guides, glossary, and models to interpret evidence, lifecycle, and unresolved questions.
→Subject history
Dates below describe the recorded subject event, not when SOG published a page.
VCHF launched on December 15, 2022 and remains represented across multiple networks with issuer and market access documented separately from the original launch.
USK launched in 2022 but is now in an orderly wind-down. First-party Rujira documentation states that new USK debt is disabled while existing positions remain repayable during the Kujira-to-Rujira transition.
SBI VC Trade began handling RLUSD in Japan as a Type 4 electronic payment instrument, adding a regulated Japanese distribution and access route without changing RLUSD's global launch date or active status.
JPYSC launched through SBI VC Trade as a trust-issued Japanese-yen stablecoin. Initial use was limited to eligible platform accounts, with external-wallet transfer and public-chain circulation unavailable.
Issue watch
These are explicit canonical gaps, not hidden assumptions.
Ethereum and Tempo identifiers are verified in the reviewed product page, while the complete current Base and Polygon contract inventory requires separate address verification.
The statutory par-redemption right and institutional mint access are documented, but complete current fees, minimums, limits, settlement guarantees, and channel availability remain unresolved.
Full and segregated reserve backing is stated, but a complete immutable report-level reserve and assurance series has not been normalized.
The statutory par-redemption right and business mint path are documented, but complete fees, minimums, limits, first-mint chronology, and current circulation remain unresolved.
Full and segregated reserve backing is stated, but a complete immutable report-level reserve and assurance series has not been normalized.
Record maintenance
Reviewed explanations
What USDC, RLUSD, and JPYSC reveal about Japan’s emerging stablecoin access model, legal routes, platform functions, and the difference between availability and unrestricted circulation.
A reviewed guide to EU/EEA stablecoin access, separating issuer status, platform state, customer scope, product functions, direct mint and redemption routes, payment rails, supported networks, and dates.
Open Standard says partners will receive all reserve earnings after a small management fee. This guide separates that partner model from holder yield and records what is still unknown before launch.